Age lines on a play bulletin proof
Checked: the age line and the advisory list on each card. Result: two cards at 4+ with empty advisories (Sneaky Sasquatch, WHAT THE GOLF?), three cards at 12+. Royal Match is 12+ with an empty advisory list. Grindstone and Ridiculous Fishing EX are 12+ with printed descriptors.
What was copied
Grindstone: occasional mild alcohol, tobacco, or drug references; frequent intense animated or fictional violence; occasional mild crude humour; occasional mild contests. Ridiculous Fishing EX: occasional mild sexual content and nudity; occasional mild animated or fictional violence; occasional mild crude humour; occasional mild alcohol, tobacco, or drug references. The original labels on the card are Dutch. The English here is a straight rendering of those labels, not a new rating.
What this proof will not do
It will not add an 18+ gate, a gambling notice, or a "responsible play" block. The age line is Apple's. Parents who want the plain version can read the For-parents material inside Tips, where each age line is repeated next to the price gap and the file size. The site still does not host the game.
Empty advisories are not upgraded into "no sensitive content". The card can leave the list blank while the age line stays 12+, which is what Royal Match does. The proof prints both observations and does not reconcile them into a softer sentence. A parent who wants a 4+ card can use the two names that actually carry 4+: Sneaky Sasquatch and WHAT THE GOLF?.
The contests line on Grindstone is the one phrase most likely to be misread on a page that also refuses gambling language. It stays inside the quotation of Apple's descriptor. The surrounding sentence says the site does not turn the word into a product category. There is no odds language, no stake, and no age gate of our own anywhere in the footer or the tips.
File size and age are independent. The largest download, Grindstone, is 12+. The smallest, WHAT THE GOLF?, is 4+. A tip that said "shorter downloads are for younger players" would invent a link the cards do not have. The tips page lists age and size as separate checks for that reason.
A parent reading only the home rank would see two 4+ cards on top and might stop. This note exists so the 12+ lines are not skipped. Royal Match is free, large by rating count, and 12+ with a blank advisory list. Grindstone is the heavy download, 12+, and explicit about fictional violence. Ridiculous Fishing EX is 12+ and explicit about several mild descriptors. Those three sentences are the parental content this proof will support. Anything softer would be a rewrite of the card.
Empty advisories are not upgraded into a claim of no sensitive content. Royal Match shows how those two fields can disagree in tone: age 12+, advisory list empty. The proof prints both and does not reconcile them. File size is independent of age. The largest card is 12+ and the smallest is 4+. A tip that tied a short download to a younger player would invent a link. Tips keeps those checks on separate lines.